Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: White washing pov edit warring by an IP Spartaz Humbug! 10:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: As I pointed out in Talk, there have been a few bad faith edits that have been reverted, though some of the content was worthy of inclusion in the article, but not in the lead, per MOS:LEADBIO.--UrbanVillager (talk) 12:07, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry from someone changing the name of "Clark's pancake house" to "Phineas and Ferb's pancake house". Not only is it wrong, but they remain adamant in their "belief" that the wrong name is the right name... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page is a little bit controversial and has a chance of IP vandalism and there is a risk of factual information being manipulated by biased and unreliable sources as previously done by some autonomous users . Rajasabh7788 (talk) 12:16, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No edits in 2025. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP addresses. JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suggest protection until the end of May, after the season has finished and all the positions have been confirmed. Thanks. Spartathenian (talk) 12:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC).
Reason: Disruptive edit warring over notability template without any evidence to assert notability. Talk page discussion from the IP editor seems WP:NOTHERE. -1ctinus📝🗨 16:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Should be protected under Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Armenia_and_Azerbaijan - Politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide—are placed under an extended confirmed restriction. Was recently vandalized by an editor to display a massive Turkish flag on the Memorial day for the Armenian Genocide - Such gross oversights should be prevented in the future, and the general sanction agrees. ⛿ WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 16:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. And it is also pretty inconsistent that they say not to edit it if you are not extended confirmed, but yet it is not an extended confirmed article 54rt678 (talk | contribs) 20:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Bananas1208 (talk · contribs) blocked by Joyous!. That was a single case four days ago. Parts of the article are under the extended-confirmed restriction, not the entire article. The Carter article is considered to have related content. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- but there were also other users who also vandalized this article and I think that there are many users who are doing it.I think you need to reconsider and give it extended protected 54rt678 (talk | contribs) 04:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (look at the History). Grenouille-e (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Grenouille-e: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible page, history of disruption, no reason for this to be edited without consensus. RaschenTechner (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- I mean the redirect "UK" RaschenTechner (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Last malicious case was 8 months ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Have Kurdish Users that support other parties and want to vandalize this page . Kurdiz (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Last disruption was 20 days ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page was created not to long ago and already have vandalism and the person was connected to Gangster Disciple and had ongoing conflicts with Black Disciples and King Von which have page protection. I believe it should have one week of protection to see if it’s really needed. Momentoftrue (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Yelover911 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. That seems to cover the bad-faith disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:57, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion by Kelonwatopdog. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog for the details. --A.S. Brown (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion by Kelonwatopdog. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog for the details. --A.S. Brown (talk) 22:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unverified additions disguised as grammatical fixes in the edit summary. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:22, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unverified additions disguised as grammatical fixes in the edit summary. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has become the topic of a Reddit post leading to edit warring. EoRdE6(Talk) 00:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of recent vandalism. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 00:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:41:C200:1:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from IP editors Rubik's Cube 3x3 talk 00:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 35.39.104.0/22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 01:09, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: A blocked user and multiple IPs have persistently vandalized it. That's why I requested indefinite semi along with filing an WP:AIV report to block the former. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 03:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Capitals00 (talk) 01:52, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and potential socking. ProtobowlAddict talk! 03:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: LibellCentral (talk · contribs) blocked by Lofty abyss. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. related to post-1992 US politics. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 03:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Again, and previously declined. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, adding nonsensical content despite countless reversions. Consistent and ongoing for years. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 04:41, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Alshahid sahi was blocked for making repeated unsourced edits, many to add a specific name as owner[1], then they sockpuppeted as 143.44.184.235 to continue making the same edit[2], and now another puppet has appeared in Al-shahid s sahi with the same edit[3]. SPI investigation is here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 05:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of edits to remove "discredited" from the lead, often by IP editors, sometimes claiming that it is unsourced. The statement is sourced both in body and lead, and consensus for it has been established. Could editing be restricted to registered users, who have a greater chance of having read e.g. MOS:LEAD? UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IP hopping vandal. Parksfan1955 (talk) 06:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors and newly registered account with "Jihadist" as part of their username, giving advice on dosages of medicine, using sources that are 36, 50 and 65 years old, when professional medical help should be sought or is required. Also adding unsourced claims about side effects and reactions to medicine. Isaidnoway (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Article was protected since 2012. The article doesn't have that much page views also. We can try to unprotect this one! 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 01:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.