Jump to content

Talk:French Revolution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeFrench Revolution was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 17, 2008WikiProject peer reviewCollaborated
October 22, 2008WikiProject peer reviewCollaborated
June 14, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
October 25, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 20, 2007.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2025

[edit]

Change slaves to enslaved people. AlexanderRayne (talk) 19:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Remsense ‥  21:01, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the shift from the National Assembly to the Constituent Assembly not clear?

[edit]

Is this a deliberate choice or an oversight. It is not clear what the difference between the national assembly, Constituent assembly and legislative assembly, Perhaps this is too general but given that this is the main article I think it is is somewhat important to at least mention this fact. Chefs-kiss (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. I have added the date the National Constituent Assembly was created to the section Creating a constitution. The creation of the Legislative Assembly is discussed in the section Varennes and after. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes to the lead

[edit]

Hello all

I have corrected some repetitions and incorrect information that has crept into the lead. For a start, the lead is supposed to be a concise summary of the article so there is no need to say twice that the revolution ended with the coup of 18 Brumaire and the establishment of the consulate with Napoleon as first consul. Once is enough. Second, the Declaration of the Rights of Man was not based on the principles of Liberty, egalite and fraternité. That slogan was first enunciated years later. Also the consulate did not end the Republic; the Consulate was a Republican government and France was still a Republic up to 1807. The lead isn't perfect by any means but I think we should discuss proposed changes on Talk and try to gain consensus for them so that obvious errors don't creep in. Most people only read the lead so it should be a showcase of accuracy and neutrality. I am also concerned that the body of the article has too much editorialising and sweeping generalisations based on scholarship from the 1960s and 1980s. I will try to update some of it it with more recent scholarship over the coming weeks and would welcome the assistasnce of other editors in doing so.

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2025

[edit]

§Constitutional Monarchy, paragraph 2. Please remove superfluous words, "attacking the". NESMRTNOST (talk) 13:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for pointing that out. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect execution date for Carrier

[edit]

The sentence suggesting Jean-Baptiste Carrier was executed on 24 March 1794 with Hébert is inaccurate. Carrier was executed on 16 December 1794, months after Robespierre’s fall. Suggest correction.

Hi, just wanted to point out that the article says Jean-Baptiste Carrier was executed on 24 March 1794 with Hébert and 19 others. This is incorrect — Carrier was not executed until 16 December 1794, several months after Robespierre’s fall. Please consider correcting that sentence. Sources: Carrier Wikipedia article. Thanks! Yahsyahaha (talk) 06:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. The cited source didn't say this and I have made the change. The entire article needs a reference check and re-write from start to finish. I hope to start on this in the near future. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 08:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]